Bet-the-company disputes are defined by their scale, complexity, and potential impact. Whether it’s a multi-million dollar contract dispute or a high-profile partnership breakdown, these cases demand strategic resolution. While litigation may seem inevitable, mediation offers a compelling alternative—one that preserves control and mitigates risk.

In trial, outcomes are dictated by judges or juries, often with limited understanding of the business context. Mediation, by contrast, allows parties to craft solutions that reflect their operational needs and strategic priorities. It’s not about avoiding conflict—it’s about resolving it intelligently.

Having litigated cases with existential implications for companies, I understand the pressure these disputes create. Mediation provides a structured environment where parties can explore resolution without the unpredictability of trial. It’s a forum for strategic negotiation, not tactical posturing.

The success of mediation in high-stakes cases depends on the mediator’s ability to manage complexity. That includes understanding financial models, regulatory frameworks, and stakeholder dynamics. It’s not enough to know the law—you must understand the business.

In my practice, I approach these mediations with the same rigor I applied in litigation. I analyze the facts, assess the risks, and guide parties toward outcomes that protect their core interests. Mediation is not a retreat—it’s a strategic advance.